2017 U16 USA Basketball Trials

In an historical sense the spirit of Memorial Day has been around since 1866. First known as “Decoration Day” because it was a day to decorate and memorialize the gravesites of fallen soldiers, Memorial Day, as we know it now, became a National Holiday to be recognized on the last Monday of May (and now the unofficial start to summer) in 1971. 
 
It is important when discussing the red, white, and blue and everything it can represent and be associated with, to have a realm of reference and, in this case, remembrance. We move pretty fast (almost too quickly) in this country and a long weekend can and should be a reminder for us to relax, reflect, and refresh.
 
It is now the annual weekend for USA Basketball to host a tryout for the current grassroots Women’s USA National Team (different each year). This year, it was for the U16 Team that will compete in June in Argentina in FIBA Americas, which is a qualifier for next year’s FIBA World Championships (U17).
 
Numerous decorated and aspiring players made the decision through either official USA Basketball invite (35 of them) or application (98 of them) to participate in rigorous camp sessions that would include multiple sessions a day and five different occurrences where the trials roster was cut to trim the possible player pool and ultimately come up with the team.
 
One Hundred Thirty-three athletes from 32 different states travelled to the US Olympic Training Center in Colorado Springs, CO to compete for 12 roster spots for the U16 National Team during the May 25th - 29th Trials
 
The Run Down: Players per class and states heavily represented ---->
 

• 2019: 63
• 2020: 58
• 2021: 12

Texas had 15 players, California had 14, Illinois had 10, and New York had 9.
 
 
U16 NATIONAL TEAM COACHING STAFF
 
Head Coach: Carla Berube, Tufts University
Assistant Coach: Steve Gomez, Lubbock Christian University
Assistant Coach: Vanessa Nygaard, Windward School (CA)
 
COURT COACHES
 
Alicia Komaki, Sierra Canyon School (CA)
Dan Rolfes, Incarnate Word Academy (MO)
Trenia Tillis Hoard, Tyler Junior College
Natalie Williams, Williams Basketball Academy (UT)
 
SELECTION COMMITTEE
Carol Callan, USA Basketball (chair)

Tamika Catchings (athlete representative)

Kevin Lynch, Philadelphia Belles (AAU representative)

DeLisha Milton-Jones (athlete representative)

Kirsten Moore, Westmont College (at-large representative)

Jill Schneider, Monterey High School, Texas (NFHS)

Mia Smith, Illinois Wesleyan University (at-large representative)
 
We get a lot of questions over the duration and after the USA Trials about the environment, how it is formatted, and our thoughts on the procedure. If you were unable to attend or have never been, the hope is to paint you a picture and give a glimpse into the gym. After all, although in a prestigious place and resulting in a coveted spot on the team, hoopin’ is hoopin’ and the dimensions of the court and rims are the same (save for some tiny details: the FIBA lane lines and the international 3-point distance).
 
Personally, while observing the activities of the weekend, it is hard not to slip into coach-mode during the drills while evaluating who not only stands out, but contemplating who I believe is the right group to make a great team. Good coaches invariably want to teach and build players up and during an event such as the USA Trials there are many teachable moments. The details and nuances that make players and teams great are so important. Who could sit in there with all of those talented players and not want to coach a group of them at some point? What a dream come true that would be – would be quite the honor and privilege.
 
Evaluating players, like recruiting, is an inexact science. You have to remember that you have a personal lens and filter, and while you should trust that, you also have to not let it hinder or detract from your observations as well. Experiences, preferences, and familiarity can potentially give you some bias – if you are aware of those things, I think you can get closer to an agenda free evaluation. This is a major benefit of working with Mark Williams and Jason Key – we all respect each other enough to listen and banter back and forth without losing sight of what really matters on the evaluation scene – THE PLAYERS. We keep each other fresh and we check each other when it is necessary. Their perspectives refresh mine, and vice versa. I think this layering or filtering is necessary. We all come from different experiences and so we get three different viewpoints. Think: a Venn Diagram with three circles; we have differences and commonalities. Throughout, I will include some “EYES OF THE COACH” points about my observations of the Trials.
 
 
DAY 1
 
SESSION 1:  Players separated into two groups; both performed the same drills
 
Warm Up / Stretch / Dynamic Movement / Light Run
 
Meet in Middle: Coach Berube spoke and set the tone / basic organization of the evening’s activities
 
Split into six groups on the different half courts (three courts total)
 

EYES OF THE COACH

There was a particular player that immediately stood out to me: 2021 Aleah Sorrentino (FL). She was the first voice I heard during warm-ups during the first session. She was encouraging and enthusiastic and brought the first energy to the Trials from the players.  I noticed it and naturally looked to see where she was from, etc. – only to find out that she was one of the youngest players on the tryout roster. Impressive! And she consistently did this throughout her participation duration, not just in this first session, but all of them. Good work, Aleah.
 
There were some varied styles of uniform/shorts of the different players. Some wore the short sleeve t-shirt under their USA practice jersey, some wore the long-sleeved dri-fit type, some had the blue side and some had the white side of the jersey showing, some tucked the jersey in and some did not, some had on the different styles of kneed pads, and some tucked their shorts into their compression shorts. I had heard things like “the committee never likes the players who dress differently to stand out” gossip from previous USA Trials – this crew didn’t seem to be worried about that.
 
 
 
USA 3-Man-Weave
            3-Man-Weave in the half court; 3 passes + finish a layup + outlet
 

EYES OF THE COACH

Being the first real drill of the Trials, this served as a time to get rid of the nervous jitters that I’m sure the majority of the players were feeling. In this drill I noticed a lot of players using dominant hand push passes even if it meant going across their bodies; many do not use the traditional chest pass. I also noticed a trend with weak hand finishes – many did not elevate with near the intensity of their dominant side; natural of course, but a tiny detail that is very correctable and an easy comfort zone item to push through. And.. even some of the best players in there missed a layup; quickly corrected because it was go time.
 
“Up Shooting”
           
Two lines – FT line extended (only 2 players on the floor at a time; the remaining players are in line outside of the sidelines on either side.)
           
The drill is started by Player 2 with a basketball and Player 1 cutting to the opposite block (going above their same side elbow, and then cutting to the low post area).
 

• Player 2 enters the ball into the post + relocates to the corner
• Player 1 receives the pass + Chin/Check (middle) + kicks the ball out for a shot for Player 2
• After the relocation + pass, Player 1 treats their next cut like they are coming off a down-screen and cuts to the free throw line area/opposite elbow jumper – they receive this pass from the same line from which they originally cut.
• Once the new Player 1 passes, they make the cut to the opposite block and the sequence continues with post entry from the new Player 2
• Both previous players involved rebound their shots and switch lines

 

EYES OF THE COACH

To start this drill, players moved very quickly and skipped the execution details of the “chin/check” on the block or the “fake a pass to make a pass” into the post. Because they were given specific instructions regarding the flow of the drill, they forgot to sharply execute the individual things that are habits of high level players: those fundamental things that elicit eye rolls from young players (until they are preventing playing time at the next level). I will say the energy and intensity of the drill was good, and once addressed by the assertive court coaches, the details improved.
 
Getting Open on the Wing
           
Coach Berube gathered the players and did a demonstration on various options/strategies to get open on the wing.  She mentioned she was not demanding a specific pivot foot (permanent or inside pivot), but did demonstrate a “1,2 step” vs “quick stop” catch. However, it was emphasized to catch loaded in the traditional triple threat position with shoulders to the rim ready to attack.
 

• V-Cuts
  • Out of the V-Cut: Sweep + 2 dribble pull up baseline side
• L-Cuts
  • Out of the L-Cut: Sweep + 1 dribble pull ups both middle and baseline side
• Backdoors
  • Layup finishes

 

EYES OF THE COACH

I am very particular with spacing and therefore points of entry for offensive purposes are something in which I believe. They players were instructed to catch the ball FT line extended and in triple threat – and many of them just floated to a general area (keep in mind there was NO defense). They do not yet value the point of catching in an area that makes the defense play you straight up and where you have multiple points of attack. The spacing of the PG to the wing was something that the court coaches had to repeatedly address. Players: wing entry spots and angles are important because it is just the first tiny step leading to the next actions of your offense; also, being that the coaches put in a post entry oriented offense later in camp, this was an important detail.
 
Changing pace and changing the rhythm of a denying defender is an important skill. “Stop and go” movements are very valuable. Selling one thing with your body language while setting up another is a nice trick of the trade.
           
Terminology is something that is VERY important on the basketball court. Coach Berube used the term “sweep” when referring to the low movement of the ball when attacking from the wing. Some of the court coaches came to their group and used the term “rip” instead – easily understood and/or interchangeable with context clues, but vital to use the same terms of the Head Coach. More importantly though, there were a lot of the sweeps that were not sweeps at all because they were too high. A low sweep does a couple of things: primes your lower body to be explosive and it also plays below a defender’s hands. Important!
 
 “3 on 2 Continuous” (or “11 man”)
           
This was the first full court drill of the trials and allowed the players to play for the first time. This drill gave an early glimpse into a few things: IQ (spacing, timing, decision making), skill, scoring ability, competitive motor (especially defensively and rebounding), passing ability/skill, communication and leadership, and finishing (among other things) in simulated transition play.
 
Three players started at half court (middle one with a basketball); 2 defensive players started on both ends in the paint.
 
Four lines were formed FT line extended and out of bounds (would receive outlet passes to continue the drill)
 
Rules:

• Limit of two passes per possession to score; one shot per possession

 

• Whoever rebounds STAYS and outlets to the awaiting players who push the ball down to the opposite end to continue the drill

 

• Remaining players (the next defenders) had to touch half court and sprint back to the paint to become the defenders.

 
Water Break
 
Off Ball Screens and Shooting 
 
The setup here was pretty simple: out of a ball reversal the passer became the screener and a player on the wing (after setting up the screen) came off the screen in various cuts and options. Both the screener and the cutter got shots after the different respective cuts and “shape-ups” from the screener.
 
Particular emphasis was placed on the timing, angle, and quality (two feet strong) of the screen, and then the spacing and sharpness of the cut and the “shape-up” of the screener. The timing and quality of the pass, the placement of the pass, and the passer’s preparation were also addressed as well. One passer hit the cutter and one passer hit the screener after the “shape-up”.
           
Players were instructed to communicate the screen verbally and non-verbally (fist up) and to set and come off the screen in a specific spot.
           

• Curl + Replace (screener)
• Refuse Screen + Replace (screener)
• Flare + Shape Up/Cut (screener)
• Straight Cut + Slip (screener)

 

EYES OF THE COACH

I was really impressed by the camp during this part of the session. This is not something that many young players do well, and they were pretty locked into the drill. It was during this part that I noticed the players who brought a consistent approach to everything they do: they have a mature air about themselves and every movement matters to them; they are sharp and value the execution of even the tiniest of details. Their hands are ready, they prep their feet before the catch, they time their screening and coming off screens well. I catch these things because they are translatable to all levels and the earlier the habits are evident, the better off that player is going to be.
 
Ball Screens and Scoring
 
The players (regardless of position) set and came off of ball screens set on the wing. The players were instructed to use the strategies previously worked on to get open on the wing and then to set up the pending ball screen with jab steps/ball fakes. There was particular emphasis on screen angles and getting “downhill” off of the ball screen. They went over three options:
 

• Use the ball screen (turn the corner to the rim/2 dribble pull up jumper)
• Refuse the ball screen (attack baseline – ONLY if there is an open lane)
• Hit the roller (different options used: pocket pass, lead to rim, bounce pass of 2 dribbles)

 

EYES OF THE COACH

The angle of ball screens is something that is important to me. It is a simple detail that can create a good attacking angle for the ball handler and make it harder for the defender to disrupt the intended action. The screen is more effective if the ball handler can get downhill, so the body angle of the screener must adjust accordingly. I would prefer for the ball handler’s shoulders to never be toward the sideline or worse, the other end of the court. A screen angle adjustment can help with this.
 
Again, in this segment, it was evident who the standard setters were. They worked with an intentional crispness and intensity. They didn’t trot and just because their turn in the drill ended, they didn’t “check out” until it was their turn again – they were talking and aware and soaking up everything.
 
 
These were the basics for Session 1 on Day 1. Group 2 got to some “           controlled 4 on 4” at the end of their session. They had a few simple rules:
 

• Keep it 4-Out (not camping on the block to post up)
• Start with Off Ball Screens
• Utilize Ball Screens if needed

 
 
DAY 2
 
SESSION 1: Players still in two groups
 
Warm Up / Encouragement / Motivation
 
USA 3-Man-Weave (in halfcourt – 2 min)
 
“USA Shooting” (Commonly knows as 5-Ball Shooting)
 
There are three lines along the baseline (ball in the middle in the first group; balls in the corners of the second group) and two players in the far end corners with basketballs.
 
The three players go three-man-weave down (3 passes); the last receiver shoots a layup and the other two players receive passes from the corners and shoot jump shots (they will stay in the corner on the far end).
 
The layup shooter starts the next 3-man-weave to the other end and will shoot a layup on the other end as well; the other two will receive passes from the corners and shoot jump shots.
 
The next group of three from the baseline continues the drill in the same sequence.
 

EYES OF THE COACH

This was an impressive start to Day 2. The pace was good, the spacing was good, and the intensity was evident. These players were ready to go. You could see a bit of tentative play as many slowed down to finish – again, a small thing, but vital when talking a fast break layup or an open jumper in transition; you have little time and this was a comfort zone thing that can easily be addressed, but the players must be aware and be willing to push themselves. Overall, this drill was performed very well.
 
Position Work
 
            **Guards: Wing Advance/Entry + Attack (Sweep & Go)
 
Layup, Pull Up, Step Back, Jab + Attack Middle (finish at rim / jumper), Shot Fake + Pull Up, Crossover at Wing + Pull Up, Hesitation Move at Wing + Pull Up, Inside-Out + Cross + Pull Up, Combo Move + Pull Up
 
            **Posts: Run Rim + Seal
 
                        Power Finish/Drop Step, Baby Jump Hooks, Turn Around Jumpers,
                        Up & Unders, Counter Moves, Counters + Spin, Wheel Moves
 

EYES OF THE COACH

 The talent of the guards in this camp was nice!! They can handle and I saw some really good jumpers off the dribble – very good tools here.
 
The post players were attentive and intentional. They listened well to their coaches and were intense in their movements. I was very encouraged by this.
 
Feeding the Post
 
            A wing would V-Cut and receive the ball from a guard in the PG position.
Wing would enter the ball into the post, who would then finish with a various post move. After post entry the wing would re-locate. The groups worked on the kick out after the relocate + repost; they also would post enter + cut off the post (many call it a “Utah” or “LA” cut) and the post would drop off the pass for a guard finish at the rim, or fake the pass and finish and/or face up for an isolation opportunity.
 

EYES OF THE COACH

Passing into the post or “post feeding” is a skill that will never go away in the game of basketball. I’ve always said if you can find a good passer, you can put that player in any scheme both offensively and defensively because they naturally understand angles and timing and value details. The idea of “fake a pass to make a pass” in relation to post feeding is foreign to many young guards. First of all they start too straight up and they are unable to maintain space from their defender. Secondly, they do not quite value the crispness and tightness with which they must fake a pass, adjust, and then execute the proper pass with a nice touch into a post that is physically battling for position constantly. There is no such thing as a straight line pass to enter into the post.
 
The relocation after post entry has a few factors/reads: how the defense reacts / the spacing of your offense / the sequence of your offense / the patterns the defense has shown you either on film our throughout the game. The important thing is to be sharp and decisive and shot prep with proper footwork so when and if the ball is kicked back out, you are a threat on the catch. Many players, when relocating to the corner, took a false prep step and went out of bounds – an absolute no, no. The footwork for corner moves and shots must be a bit tighter and slightly different. Details!
 
Passing Out of the Double Team (Posts) / Defensive Fundamentals of the Double Team
 
The players were set up with a PG and two wings + a post player. The ball was entered to the wing on the post’s side. Upon post entry + relocation: weak side wing defender would double the post on the catch.
 
Points of Emphasis:

• Defenders jumping to the ball on the wing entry
• Defense talk on double team & rotation out of the double
• Weak side wing relocating/making themselves available for the kick out
• Post player re-posting after the kick out
• Offense communicating the recognition of the double team

 

EYES OF THE COACH

The players did a pretty decent job of listening to the instructions here. Some things to remember: The “chin/check” portion of a post up has an execution value and it applies directly to double teams. If a player keeps a strong posture, they can keep a good space between them and the ball and the defender. Many posts, when they first see a double team, stand straight up; thereby allowing the double team to be most effective.
 
The other point for a guard is to, again, relocate to make themselves available at a good passing angle to the post player. You must be shot ready on what is likely a close-out situation: a perimeter player’s dream!
 
2 on 1 in the Half Court
           
This was a quick and intense way to simulate a 2 on 1 situation in a game. The ball would start in the corner. (ONE PASS ONLY in a 2 on 1 situation.)
 
Pass is made from the corner to (about) the half court line near the sideline on the same side. Then, the ball is skipped to the opposite side. Once the opposite side caught the ball, it became a live 2 on 1.
 
The initial defender started at half court and when the first pass was made, they sprinted into the paint to challenge the offensive players.
 
The rest of the drill continued like this: if a player either shot the ball or turned the ball over, they became the next defender by sprinting to half court and returning to the paint to guard: it was the other players’ responsibility to quickly outlet the ball to the corner so it could be advance and skipped so the next two players could attack 2 on 1 as fast as possible.
 

SESSION 2: Players still in two groups
 
Warm Up / Encouragement / Motivation
 
2 Line Shooting Drill
 
Players split into different groups in the various half courts. They were in two lines free throw line extended and facing each other. They got several shots out of this formation:
            Cut through to the block for a lay-up
            Short jumper up the lane line
            Mid-range jumper a bit more up the lane line
            15 foot jumper around the FT line
            3-point shots
            Sweep/Shot Fake + attack shots off the bounce
           

EYES OF THE COACH

This is a simple drill to get players into a good shooting rhythm. As with many young players, each individual in this drill did not prep for their shot in a consistent manner – and it caused them to shoot the ball differently. Shooting starts in your feet and that translates to a loaded base. This drill starts players close to the rim and builds outward and then eventually to shots off the bounce. Players: take advantage of the close shots to build your rhythm and then carry that over to every other shot you take – always!
 
3 on 3: FIBA RULES
 
            The players were lined up shortest to tallest and counted off into teams.
 
            Some of the simple rules:
 

• Shooting fouls are 1 point + shot
• On makes/misses, the ball must clear the 3-point line before the other team can attack/score (pass or dribble)
• Score is in 1’s and 2’s (behind the arc)
• Jump ball goes to the defense
• After a dead ball, the ball must be “checked” at the top

 

EYES OF THE COACH

More or less observations here than teaching points – I think it is interesting that after a checked ball or a made basket, that FIBA 3 on 3 rules don’t require players to pass the ball in vs having the ability to put it on the floor as the first action. If 3 on 3 is used to teach the game/grow the game, I feel like this would be better (purely my opinion of course).
 
We saw some selfish play initially, which means a ton of dribbling. As the play continued and leadership took over, the qualities of team play improved.
 
SESSION 3: Players still in two groups
 
Warm Up / Encouragement / Motivation
 
Transition Offense (Teaching) ----> This is a pretty traditional break:
 

1. Post Rim Runner
2. Wings Out Ahead (wide and FT line extended in half court)
3. Trail Fwd/Post Player even with the lane line
4. PG receives outlet to attack/put pressure on the paint and establishes a side if there is not true “Fast Break” situation; they initiate things from a lane line extended area (wing entry/reversal/etc.)

 
Secondary Options:
           

1. Wing Entry + Ball Side Cut
2. Wing Entry + Weak Side Cut (Fill to wing on Ball Screen / Roll & Rise Action after reversal)
3. Ball Reversal Through Trailer (Check for High-Low) + Ball Screen (Roll & Rise Action)

 
 
5 on 5 Full Scrimmage
 
            8 minute segments / :24 shot clock
 

EYES OF THE COACH

The effect of the :24 second shot clock was immediately evident. With a short clock like that, transition flow into secondary (if there is no immediate attack advantage) is vital. If that ball sticks on one side of the floor for too long and the defense can load to one side, it causes trouble. The correlation was this: the more dribbling equaled the less ball reversals, which meant fewer quality shots. Some of the more dynamic guards really put a lot of pressure on the paint and that was awesome to see. Some of the fwd/posts lead the break on a couple occasions and that was impressive. 2020 Cameron Brink (OR) put a stutter step move on someone in transition that was jaw-dropping. The posts in this camp for the most part could really run the rim. Great effort!
 
DAY 3
                       
SESSION 1: Players still in two groups
 
Warm Up
 
Position Work: Split Guards and Posts
 
            **Guards:
 
Side Pick & Roll Work

1. Attack for pull up/floater/finish
2. Bounce out and attack the hedge
3. Split the ball screen

 
Drive/Drift/Fill Work
3 player drill ----> PG enters to the wing – wing drives hard baseline – opposite wing drifts to corner – PG fills ball side wing – pass is made to the drifter
 
Penetration & Kick
PG would attack lane line and kick to ball side wing; PG would clear/relocate; Wing would attack the paint to create a jumper for the opposite wing
 

EYES OF THE COACH

            Just a couple of things here:
When attacking a ball screen, it is important to get “downhill” ASAP. This has a bit to do with timing and a lot to do with footwork. They worked a particular sequence where Coach Berube had them bounce out to attack a hard hedge. Players: on that bounce out, you must load your feet at the right angle and not bounce out to go around the post, but to go by the post – shoulders to the rim.
 
On the penetrate and kick / drive and drift drills: we saw a lot of inside hand & across the body passes again. Also, if you are penetrating to create a shot for a teammate, you must be a threat. Again the word creeps up: DOWNHILL. For the most part, the first drive was downhill, but the second one was occasionally a lateral drive – a smart defender will not commit to help to someone that is not actually penetrating the defense.
 
              **Posts:
 
1) Rim Run + Post Up (various finishes / some vs dummy D)
2) Trail Jumpers – Catch & Shoot at the Elbow / Once bounce from the 3 point line
3) Reversal + High Low Work (both get shots)
 

EYES OF THE COACH

The release point of a shot is very important, but especially if you are a post player trying to be a threat away from the paint. Naturally, you’ll be playing an opponent of likely similar size. If your shot release is low, you may stand 6’3 but a low release makes you the equivalent of 5’9.
 
In the High-Low game, timing, awareness, and angles are everything. The trailing post must be aware of their teammate and their D before they catch the ball. The post player must continue to post to the ball until the ball is moved and they have to use their feet to ensure the high-low pass can get there. Many think their hands are good enough, but if their feet don’t work, essentially the high-low pass becomes a jump ball – an even chance for the defender to get it as well. We saw this a lot.
 
These posts worked very hard and were physical in their post work. For the most part all of them showed signs of versatility either in face up game or in the trail post being able to make a mid-range jumper.
 
*** First cuts were made after this session. As Session 2 began, 88 players remained. ***
 
SESSION 2: Players still in two groups
 
Warm Up
 
Offensive Situations / Concept Breakdowns
 
            3 on 3 in “Post Feed Triangle” situation
PG entered the ball to the wing and cut ball side corner; Live out of post feed
 
4 on 4 : High-Low/Reversal + Ball Screen (Roll & Rise); Live on reversal
 
 
5 on 5
           
8 minute segments / :24 shot clock
 

EYES OF THE COACH

The intensity really picked up in 5 on 5 after the first cuts. Not only does the idea of possibly being cut become more real to players, but the quality of player overall is sharper.
 
 
*** Second cuts were made after this session. As Session 3 began, 64 players remained. ***
 
SESSION 3: Players still in two groups
 
After the warm up, the main teaching focus to begin this session was on half court execution details. In the offense that was installed, the PG (at this point) had just a few options:
 

1. Wing entry & cut to the ball side corner
2. Wing entry & cut to the opposite corner (high split off of the elbow)
3. Reverse the ball through the trailer

 
They talked post entry + actions, high-low timing, cut angles and pace, penetration spacing/movement without the ball, and some discussed transition defensive responsibilities out of different scenarios.

5 on 5
           
8 min segments / :24 shot clock
 

EYES OF THE COACH

Once we got to 64, the play got really good. The dynamic PG’s had more options, the posts got the ball earlier, the speed and pace picked up, and there were more amazing athletic plays made. Once at 64 - IT GOT REAL. In a situation like this, you have to keep in mind to almost weigh your evaluation heavier with what we began to see at this point because the quality of competition and intensity really went through the roof. These guys did not want to go home. Hats off, ladies!
 
 
DAY 4
           
*** The player pool was cut down to 37 before the start of the last day. ***
 
SESSION 1: Players are now in one group
 
Warm Up
 
Guards/Posts Split for Shooting
 
            Guards: 2 Line Shooting (from FT line extended)
           
            Posts: 2 Line Shooting (from baseline) / Short Corner Cuts + Shot
                        Also got in some rim runs + post up / Reverse Pivot + Face Up
 
Team Offense:
 
They added another wrinkle to their offense on Sunday morning. It involved a dribble entry option and a “little on big” screen + a post pin down “clean up” screen. This still flowed into their spaced ball screen + roll & rise actions they had been practicing throughout the trials.
 
5 on 5
 

EYES OF THE COACH

As they added wrinkles to their offense and make it more dynamic with a new action, there were some teaching moments.
 

1. Dribble Entry. Guards: the pace (and change of), the angle, and getting your shoulders back downhill once you get to the wing are vital. The defense (your defender and even primary help) needs to believe you can turn that corner.

 

2. Ball Screens: Guards: If you do not have a quick pocket pass, come off of that ball screen with a couple of dribbles and create a readable angle to see how the D has played your action. Also, it is very hard to throw over an athlete, especially with your inside hand. Don’t be afraid to use that weak hand – become a great passer.

 

3. The athleticism on the wing once at 37 was incredible. There was a lot of trouble getting open on the wing. This is timing, footwork, and reading the D. They are going to be running a post-involved offense, so the ball must get to the wing. I am sure there will be a couple of pressure relief strategies implemented before they play in Argentina. They will also need an action for when the reversal is overplayed as well. All simple and easy things to address with a group this talented.

 
 

4. Post Play: Once they were all big and mobile, this is when the battling really started. Post play is a foot and leverage fight at all times. On many occasions the high low pass was disrupted because the low post neglected to seal with their feet as well as their upper body. It was a battle in the paint.

 

5. Posts receiving cross-screens and guards receiving down-screens: It is better to be late than early. Wait, set up your screen, and then once your screener is set, come off the screen and read your defender accordingly. To be a good screener, you must be aware of where the ball is, the timing of the action, and also both defenders involved in the play. Separate quickly and decisively from the screen, so your passer can clearly read the defense and make a good decision accordingly.     

 
 
SESSION 2:
 
Warm Up
 
Half Court Review/Strategies
 
5 on 5
 
*** This was the last session. The next morning the field was cut to 18. ***
 

FINAL THOUGHTS

It was really impressive to me to see such young players improve over a four day period. The ones who naturally adapt are special. They come back each session better than the previous one. That shows me that they have ownership of their individual player development and that mature mindset will serve them very well.
 
The unique thing about this event (one that I believe is the best evaluation tool annually) is that these players have to do it on their own. They are, for the most part, unfamiliar and they truly have to earn their advancement. No one can protect them with particular scheduling or a substitution. They are playing for something they cannot be awarded; they have to earn it head to head. They are playing for something they all greatly value.
 
As the quality of player, athleticism, size, and length increased on the floor, the IQ of players gets tested. They are expected to make plays within the system they were just given. And since they are on the floor with so much talent, they have to make plays in small space; they cannot attack at their leisure because a high level defender is sitting in help.
 
From an evaluation standpoint, once you see a player play at a high level that level becomes the standard of expectation. I hope to see these players take what they learned and improved upon and carry those things with them to their teams and their workouts. They are capable players and I want to see them be capable leaders as well. Maintain these standards!
 
I think this was a nice preview for these young players into how mental preparation is just as important as physical preparation, if not more. They will see multiple game plans and multiple styles and have to be ready to make adjustments on the fly. Just like studying a scouting report in college or only having only one day in between NCAA Tournament games, they’ve got to be sharp and be able to carry those things over to the court. One tiny detail can be the difference sometimes, and over time those tiny details just become habits of a high quality player.
 
18 FINALISTS
 
*DIAMOND MILLER – (2019 NJ) Top level athlete; showed the ability to knock down the long range three ball and be effective in the paint; She can be a very high level defender at the next level with the ability to guard 1-4. Very versatile with a respectable handle; Tireless competitor, locked in at all times (Applicant Athlete)
 
*JORDAN OLIVER – (2019 TX) Very good athlete who certainly competes. As the Trials went on, she got better. She showed high levels of instinct and IQ on the defensive end; showed a very nice pull up jumper in the mid-range. She was really good on the glass and on a couple of possessions, she got more than one offensive rebound – impressive! (Invitee)
 
ASHLEY OWUSU – (2019 VA) Very smooth player, and can surprise you with explosive attacks at the basket; very good creating off the dribble. She is a big guard with a good feel for the game. Has played on the big stage for a while now. (Invitee)
 
RAMANI PARKER – (2019 CA) Versatile player, tall and long; She has a simple way to her game that makes her very effective because she doesn’t try to do too much – old school element to her game. She is a great weak side shot blocker – almost sneaky in how she does it. Her 15-18 foot jumper has a great touch. She has some rawness to her too – high ceiling! (Applicant Athlete)
 
*CELESTE TAYLOR – (2019 NY) Prototypical 2 guard; has a brilliant fundamental base – uses jabs & shots fakes very well to get to her 1 or 2 bounce pull up jumper. The 3 ball is nice; she is an explosive finisher at the rim and can finish in a variety of ways. She is economical in the way she uses her dribbles – never pounding that thing too much. Great feel for the game. (Invitee)
 
*KYLEE WATSON – (2020 NJ) Workhorse! Her footwork in and around the paint is A1. She seals extremely well and feels the defense and counters very well. She has nice face up game. She is a good passer and is well aware of spacing and placement on the floor. A couple of times she got a long rebound, pushed the ball with impressive speed and made great decisions. (Invitee)
 
MADDIE BURKE – (2020 PA) SHOOTER! She has a great frame to be a wonderful shooter for a long time. There is a perfection to her release that leads to really crisp makes; she showed a bit of shake off the bounce as well. She has a bit of Katie Smith (Ohio State/WNBA) to her game – she plays very hard and is good on the glass. Wonderful fundamental foundation to her game. (Invitee)
 
*CAITLIN CLARKE – (2020 IA) Crafty and poised PG with a nice handle and feel for the game. She reads timing and angles very well on both ends – makes her a very good defender on and off the ball. She knows how to make others better while being a scoring threat herself. She is a very good shooter. She reminds me a bit of U17 player (last year) Taylor Mikesell. (Invitee)
 
*ZIA COOKE – (2019 OH) Electric with the rock!! She is quick, fast, athletic… all of that. She stood out from Day 1 to Day 4. This PG can dance with that thing.. She knows how to create angles in small space to shake her defender to score or create for teammates. She showed a nice 3 ball, pull up, and finishing at the rim. She competed defensively and always put pressure on the other team with ball pressure or pushing the ball down the floor. She showed nice leadership attributes as well. Has some Tyler Scaife/Kelsey Mitchell/Russell Westbrook elements to her game. (Invitee)
 
*AZZI FUDD – (2021 VA) Eye opening young guard. She is poised well beyond her years. She is physically strong and had no problem competing with players older than her. Her eyes are up and she distributes the ball and controls the tempo of games by leading her team. She has a nice pull up – elevation and high release. She is going to be fun to continue to watch. (Applicant Athlete)
 
*JORDAN HORSTON – (2019 OH) Wiry and fast! A big guard. She can score from all three levels and competes defensively at a high level. She really got into passing lanes well and pushed the ball well. She showed a nice motor and was locked in and focused the whole Trials. She is creative with the dribble and can create her own shot as well as get by her defender with hesitations and combo moves. She has a nice maturity to her that will serve her well as her game translates to the next levels. (Invitee)
 
HALEY JONES – (2019 CA) “Swiss Army Knife” type of game; She is a very good all around basketball player that can truly play positions 2-4 because she has the skill and IQ to do so. She understands flow, reads the floor so well, and can score in a variety of ways. She got on the glass well and can rebound and lead the break or sprint the lane and get ahead of the break. I’m a big fan.. (Invitee)
 
RIVER BALDWIN – (2019 AL) Powerful and mobile! She posts hard and is a ferocious rebounder. She is nimble on her feet and fast. She has a nice touch out to 15 feet. Defensively, she carves out a lot of space and can cover a lot of ground. She is a skilled true post player, but don’t pigeonhole her. She can put the ball on the deck and take it to the rim. (Invitee)
 
*FRAN BELIBI – (2019 CO) Everyone has seen her dunk clips and knows she is an incredible athlete. She can really get up and rebound and does a nice job exploding out to start the break. On multiple occasions she got in defensive passing lanes and put pressure on her opponents. She can really wreak havoc defensively and then on the offensive end can attack an opposing post/power forward with her slasher like talent. (Invitee)
 
*ALIYAH BOSTON – (2019 MA) Major post presence. Had an impressive showing last year at U17’s and did not disappoint this year. She has true back to the basket game and a nice touch in finishing from the HP area and just outside the paint. Strong and powerful athlete who is locked in and competitive – very reliable!! (Invitee)
 
CAMERON BRINK – (2020 OR) HELLO! An eye opening prospect. She stands a true 6’4 and is agile, quick, and mobile. She was playing against players with more natural strength than her, but was resilient on both ends. She had some jaw dropping moments – from blocked shots to moves off the dribble. She shows immense potential to be a hybrid type of player – forward/post game and the IQ and skills to go with it. Most impressive to me: she supported her fellow Trials participants and didn’t let a good thing go unnoticed when she was on her 5 on 5 teams – she wasn’t afraid to share her voice. She also has that adaptability that shows me she is unafraid to confront weaknesses; she came back to each session better than the last. She still has a rawness to her game that makes her arguably the most intriguing prospect in the camp.. Just wait and watch. (Invitee)
 
*SAM BRUNELLE – (2019 VA) The vet! By making last year’s team, Brunelle opened eyes all over the world to her talent. She is as fundamentally sound as they come – range, vision, handle, post game, perimeter game. She looks to be in great shape and showed leadership qualities. She is going to be a weapon in their system and will be able to play multiple spots for Team USA. (Invitee)
 
*PAIGE BUECKERS – (2020 MN) Hooper!! She has a wonderful feel for the game and can dance a bit with the rock. She is a good shooter with PG skills that make her a threat every time she touches the ball. Defensively she uses her anticipation skills, quickness, and length to get to the right spots to disrupt her opponents – she got a ton of tips and steals. She is no stranger to the gym – she can play! (Invitee)
 
* Made the Final 12 Roster for USA for FIBA Americas
 
 
CLOSING (You’re thinking… “ Finally! ”)
 
As it tends to do every year, this event creates debate, comparison, and ultimately some disagreement. I sat in every session and paid close attention to details, coaching points/emphasis, and player attention, play, growth, and aptitudes. I will say that I did not envy the position of the committee in any way. Throughout these Trials it became more and more evident to me that there was a pool of anywhere between 16-21 players that could conceivably make this roster – and that roster could be a successful one.
 
Ultimately, decisions have to be made and the simple fact of the matter is: although there were numerous deserving candidates, only 12 get chosen. I think the committee did a great job with the pool of players. Immediately after the 18 were chosen (and even some when it was cut to 37) the opinions really started flying and theories as to “why” arise. There can be an argument made for ALL of them in this deserving pool. As we all should know, pleasing everyone will never happen. If the number is 24 (McDonald’s All-Americans for example), candidates for numbers 25-30 feel slighted – and they have a rightful claim to have been chosen. Again, the simple math of the situation wins.
 
“Heavy is the head that wears the crown..”
 
I think respect for the committee and coaching staff must be expressed. I watched every bounce and I can unequivocally tell you that I DO NOT know that I have the right answer. To suggest there was one right answer takes away from one of the greatest aspects of sports: the discussion, debate, the subsequent decision and then getting to watch it play out in the competition. What does that tell me? That we have a lot of good players in this country and they came to Colorado Springs and competed!
 
“The whole is greater than the sum of its parts ..”
 
Also, it should be pointed out that the coaches and committee were forming a team that needs to (relatively quickly) function as a unit. Putting together the most individually talented players in spots 1-12 is not the way to do that. They have to take their philosophy for how this team can play and apply it to choosing the best flowing pieces for that TEAM. I will say that in watching the schemes and skill instruction by this year’s staff led by Head Coach Carla Berube, systematically it is more of a fit than last year’s system that clogged the paint and didn’t allow our playmakers to play a style conducive to their strengths. This year I believe they will be able to create the tempo that will be beneficial for this group of players. There was more emphasis placed on transition and getting out on the break even in the tryout camp. The actions introduced this year are very similar to the system that Pitt Head Coach Suzie McConnell-Serio utilized for the U18 team last year. The ball reverses quickly and the pattern is not as predictable, the players move and have options, and the floor is spaced enough for them to read and make plays.
 
“Teaching kids to count is fine, but teaching them what counts is best..”
 
I think a teaching moment is missed when there is public outcry or when there is an implication that “politics” (overused buzz word) go into things. Obviously there is a human element to this – from the inviting of the players, to the players themselves competing and playing, to the choosing of the selection committee, to the actual choosing of the team by the committee.
 
We miss the opportunity to teach a “real world” lesson to the young people who are undoubtedly paying attention to the outcome of the USA Trials, let alone the participants themselves. The bottom line is we all face failure at some point. We portray success now like there was no uphill battle to get there – and that is very inaccurate. So why not acknowledge it and use it as motivation? Why not accept the outcome (does not mean you have to agree or be satisfied with it) and use it as a way to renovate our personal grading rubric and standards so we can sharpen our craft?
 
“Let me never fall into the vulgar mistake of dreaming that I am persecuted whenever I am contradicted.. ”
 
We send the wrong message to these young people if we imply that because we try our (current) hardest that obtaining our current objective is inevitable. We also send the wrong message if we supply excuses for them by suggesting that the “powers that be” are holding them back arbitrarily.
 
It is thought that “logic” can be applied (like it is simply “scientific fact” understandable) to experiences with a human element. Have you read Malcolm Gladwell’s OUTLIERS? A quick note from the back cover:
 
The lives of outliers – people whose achievements fall outside normal experience – follow a peculiar and unexpected logic …
 
My point is this – let’s admire the achievement of the process for these players: the preparation, the travel, the time and emotions spent; every one of them that attended these trials competed with a class and grace that should be celebrated. I never looked on the floor and saw someone who disrespected this opportunity.
 
“The credit belongs to the (wo)man who is actually in the arena … Because there is not effort without error and shortcomings … ”
 
Obviously there were those more talented than others, those who were more prepared, those who were able to focus in sharper to the task at hand, and finally those that put together what it took at this moment to make this team.
 
The fact remains: ALL OF THEM regardless of outcome should leave intending to improve in some regard and in different aspects of the game.
 
“You can’t let praise or criticism get to you. It’s a weakness to get caught up in either one.. ”
 
If you ever walk out of a gym and did not take a little something with you to sharpen the tools in your bag, you missed out. This gym this weekend was filled with coaches, parents, players, and fellow evaluators – so much to learn and to learn from… ample opportunities.
 
“A coach is someone who can give correction without causing resentment.. ”
 
The last thing that needs to be noted is that if we can remember to evaluate these players through the eyes of a coach (someone who knows there is room for growth and responsibly holds them accountable to do so), I think some of the argumentative comments and/or dialogue would taper off some in the arena of youth sports. Rankings or publicity aren’t an accomplishment, they are an occurrence. Let’s remember not to hold the players accountable for the environment for which adults have created.
 
Congratulations to the participants, coaches, and the committee.
 
CONGRATULATIONS to the TEAM that will represent our country at FIBA Americas in the next few weeks.
 
Premier Basketball Report proudly supports all of you!!
 
However, it does not stop now. You still have work to do… As do we.
 
PREMIER BASKETBALL REPORT subscribers will receive a full report from the U16 Trials.
 
For more content from the USA Trials weekend including daily commentary and player interviews visit @bballjkey , @MarkWilliamsBB , @ShaneLaflin , & @PBRHoops